Single male D.o.B. August 21, 1963, been on death row since age of 18, over 22 years in prison, seeking correspondence and support from all (both men and women), from all professions examples journalists, United Nations Personnel, Foreign Government-officials, United States Supreme Court’s law clerks, and citizens from all across the nations. Hopefully we’ll help expose the corruption inside the judiciary and bring end to death penalty in U.S.A.

William and Mr. Majestyk

Motion 1988

Filed May 10, 1988 Becky Skillman Clerk Lawrence Circuit Court

New Indiana Governor Daniels and Lt. Governor Becky Skillman assume office in January 2005

Yes, Becky Skillman is same person, means, fully aware of Minnick’s case.

Easy to maintain Capital Punishment in Indiana, especially, when your aware of forgeries, perjured testimonies along with Indiana Supreme Court’s Falsifications of records in Minnick v. State (Oct. 2, 1989), 544 N.E.zd 471.

Passing legislation Indiana Rules of Criminal Procedure, Criminal Rule 24 Capital Cases.

Two (2) attorneys at ninety dollars per hour (each). Attorneys are making more Minnick in prison over 23 years now.

In December 1, 2004, Lawrence Circuit Court Judge (Woman Judge is the sister to female juror who convicted Minnick in 1985) overturned Minnick’s death sentence and committed Minnick to Logan Port Hospital (Mental Health Department) by declaring Minnick legally incompetent.

No sentencing date can be set until Logans Port Hospital authorities declare Minnick competent. Could be months or years.

See: Defendant’s Brief Concerning Sentencing, dated November 12, 2004.
Exhibit Finding of aggravating and mitigating circumstances and order of execution, October 16, 1985.
Motion for Production of Evidence money now in history of Capital Punishment in Indiana.

  
Execution Order 1985

Compared to 1989, Indiana public defender rate one (1) attorney, thirty dollars or thirty five dollars per hour.

Minnick’s voice has been silent, in court, by declaring him legally incompetent, and committing him to Logans Port Hospital. Removing his attorneys Monica Foster and Rhonda Long-Sharp as Minnick’s attorneys in State Court’s proceedings.

Minnick’s appeals in Federal Court has been stayed pending State Court’s proceedings.

Equal Protection Clause and due process of law under the fourteenth Amendment of U.S. Constitution of America

Just like Article, in Emerge Magazine, issued October, 1999.

Federalist Society want to overturn landmark cases in 1960s and 70s.

March 18, 1963, U.S. Supreme Court ruled all criminal and illegally acquired evidence no longer admissible in both state and Federal courts.

Pay attorneys not to argue their client’s constitutional rights violations and keep illegal evidence from being argued in their client’s case to see the convictions intacted.

and prevent their client’s from obtaining their freedom back cover-up state’s corrupt officials exposure.

In 1988, Indiana Court of Appeals Judge earn estimated $ 61. 000,00 per year.

In 2003, Indiana Court of Appeals Judge earn estimated $ 113. 000,00 per year (Death Penalty big money Revenue to ones with law degrees) Attorney’s public defender rate estimated $ 30 to 35 per rate in 1988.

In 2003 Indiana Public defender earn estimated $90 oer hour and two (2) attorneys in Capital Punishment case.

Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989) Falsifications of records. Forgery charging information Count 1A (First Trial p. 75) violated Indiana Code § 35-50-2-9 Death Sentence Statute …in a page separate from the rest of the charging instrument… Charging Information is a Charging instrument!

Minnick’s voice is silent in Courts now.

Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989) 544 N.E.td. 471 Falsified records I.e. § 35-50-2-9 Death Sentence Charging Information Count 1A (First Trial p. 75) (date subscribed) and sworn to before me, have been attered, making document a forgery.) violated Indiana Code § 35-50-2-9 Indiana Rules of Criminal Procedure, Criminal Rule 24 Capital Cases adopted November 30, 1989 took effect January 1, 1990.

(A) Supreme Court Cause Number. Whenever a prosecuting attorney seeks the death sentence by filing a request pursuant to Ind. Code § 35-50-2-9, the prosecuting attorney shall file that request with the trial Court and with the Court administrator, Indiana Supreme court, 312 State House, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Upon receipt of same, the court Administrator shall open a cause number in the Supreme Court and notify counsel.

On December 1, 2003, Judge Miller set an “Evidentiary hearing and Oral Arguments, “For 9:30a.m. South Bend Time, July 8, 2004, ordering William Minnick to be present in Federal Courtroom.”

On July 1 2002, Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, vacating district court’s decision (August 22, 2000), Remanded back to District Court ordering habeas (Federal Appeal) proceedings start a fresh, appointment new district Judge and new attorneys.

11/09/02     94     Motion by petitioner William A. Minnick for immediate evidentiary hearing 
                         with attachments. (188 pages)

01/23/03     96     Letter from petitioner William A. Minnick asking for a hearing and an attorney visit.

Filing Deadlines The anti-terrorism an effective death penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”) established a one- year period of limitation for the filing of a section 2255 motion. Motions made after the one year period will not be heard. 

Attorneys Monica Foster and Alan Freedman appointed January 27, 2003, approximately 209 days into 365 days to undermine this appeal again. Minnick has guardian ad litem; Attorney Thomas Durkin appointed.

Minnick been separated from type-writer, most of my property and isolated in the cell 23 or 24 hours a day, to undermine this appeal since February 11,2003.

(Attorneys don't care how death row prisoners are treated, as a long as the condemned prisoner doesn't work on his appeal to jeopardize attorneys cash flow) - Minnick is not getting paid $ 125 per hour.

03/17/03     106     Motion by petitioner William A. Minnick for immediate evidentiary hearing.

05/23/03     114     Order... A brief evidentiary hearing and oral argument shall be hold at 
                           1:30 p.m. South Bend Time, on January 9, 2004. Counsel shall advise the Court 
                           if more than the scheduled half day is needed for these proceedings 
                           William A. Minnick will be present at the hearing...

How do you undermined this appeal to stop judiciary from being police or stop January 9, 2004 hearing? Do not meet the filing deadlines and file for extensions.

Attorneys had a filing deadline scheduled for September 22, 2003. However, Attorney Monica Foster filed “Request for Extension” Which is probably real reason for attorneys visit September 18, 2003, Thursday.

Capital Punishment?

In 1991 the Honorable Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals cautioned Indiana Courts that “before sending a man to his death, a state should have more regard for both law and fact than Indiana has shown.” Brewer vs. Aiken (7th Circuit, 1991) 935F.zd 850.

How Mafia with law degrees are operating freely inside the judiciary to push a hidden agenda against individuals’ rights and freedoms to promote fascism insided a corrupt judiciary in Indiana? Nor do corrupt officials believe in equalization. Only exploitation of victims for money.

The Court described the immunity of judges as follows

”Few doctrines were more solidly established at common law than the immunity of judges from liability for damages for acts committed within their judicial jurisdiction, as this Court recognized when it adopted the doctrine, in Bradly v. Fisher, 13 Wall 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872). This immunity applies even when the judge is accused of acting maliciously and corruptly, and its is not the protection or benefit of a malicious or corrupt judge but for the benefit of the public whose interest it is that the judge should be at liberty to exercise their functions with independence and without dear of consequences. “ 386 U.S., at 553-554, 87 S.Ct., at 1217. Imbler, supra, at 96 S.Ct., at page 987

How much money involved?

In 1988, Indiana Court of Appeals Judge earn estimated $ 61.000.00 a year job.

In 2003, Indiana Court of Appeals Judge earn estimated $ 113.000.00 a year job.

(1998-2003) 15 years x_$ 61.000.00 = $ 915.000.00 not counting pay increases since 1988 or retirement benefits/pension. (only one person)

Minnick doesn't believe this is isolated case or isolated to one State's Supreme Court. Innocence is not a constitutional claim. What? Minnick doesn't believe that, however, majority of Justices on United States Supreme Court states!

Green light for Genocide Mode.

United State Supreme Court Chief Justive William Rehnquist wrote:

All of these constitutional safeguards of course, make it more difficult for the state to rebut and finally overturn the presumption of innocence which attaches to every criminal defendant. But we have also observed that "(d)ue process does not require that every conceivable step be taken, at whatever cost, to eliminate the possibility of convicting an innocent person." Patterson v. New York, 432 U.S. 197, 208, 97 S. Ct. 2319, 2326, 53 L.Ed. 2d 281 (1977).
To conclude otherwise would all bet paralyze our system for enforcement of the criminal law. Herrera v. Collins (01/25/1993, decided 6  - 3) (113 S.Ct. 853), at 113 S.Ct., at 860

This rule is grounded in the principle that federal habeas courts sit to ensure that individuals are not imprisoned in violation of the Constitution - not to correct errors of fact. See, e.g., Moore v. Dempsey, 261 U.S. 86, 87-88, 43 S.Ct. 265,67 L.Ed. 543 (1923) (Holmes, J.) ("(w)hat we have to deal with (on habeas review) is not the petitioners' innocence or guilt but solely the question whether their constitutional rights have been preserved.") Hyde v. Shine, 199 U.S. 62, 84, 25 S.Ct. 760, 764, 50 L.Ed. 90 (1905)
("(I)t is well settled that upon habeas corpus the Court will not weigh the evidence.") (emphasis in original); Ex parte Terry, 128 U.S. 289, 305, 9 S.Ct. 77, 80, 32 L.Ed. 405 (1988) ("As the Writ of habeas corpus does not perform the office of a writ of error or an appeal (the facts establishing guilt) cannot be re-examined or reviewed in this collateral proceeding." (emphasis in original) Herrera v. Collins (01/25/1993, 6-3), at 113 S.Ct., at 860-861,

But this body of our habeas jurisprudence makes clear that a claim of "actual innocence" is not itself a constitutional claim...
Herrera v. Collins (01/25/1993, Texas death penalty case, 6-3), at 113 S.Ct., at 862.

As Honorable 7th Circuit cautioned Indiana's court in Brewer v. Aiken, (1991) supra,

It's time to place these corrupt Justices under oath in Federal Courtroom hold them accountable. Why? Because they are openly falsifying Indiana Supreme Court's official opinion (records); once they realized citizens' constitutional rights were violated, in death penalty case to guarantee citizen never obtains his or her constitutional rights in a courtroom, to take citizen's life by execution so corrupt officials can keep face and maintain their economic social status in society.

which is why it's so important to show the method of operation how Indiana Supreme Court is falsifying records.

Minnick should have a Constitutional Rights under the “Confrontation Clause” of 6th Amendment, and under the “due process of law and equal protection clause” of the 14th Amendment of the United Stated Constitution of America, have each Justice sworn-in under oath on witness stand who participated in Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989), 544 N.E.zd 471 to read sections of opinion and ask is that fact true? Yes or No?

Then read trials transcripts, questions and answers verifying fact is wrong, false untrue or just a blatant lie.

Example: Motion For Immediate Evidentiary Hearing

Filed December 9, 2002, pages 32 read part in opinion (Official Court’s finding) then trials transcripts cited on page 33-34, same with page 35-36, 37, 39, 41, 43 ect…)

The United Nations must understand there is “no fair and impartial Death Penalty Review in Indiana Supreme Court who are openly falsifying findings of facts to cover – up illegalities of conviction and to guarantee the poor never obtain their constitutional Rights in a fair system.

United States District Court should issue the subpoenas to following Justices who participated in Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989), 544 N.E 2d 471 Falsifications of public records:

1. Corrupt Chief Justice Randall Shepard
2. Justice Brent Dickson
3. Retired Justice Roger De Bruler
4. Retired Justice Richard Givan
5. Retired Justice Alfred Pivarnik

Hold “Evidentiary Hearing in Federal Courtroom” place each justice under oath with no immunity, eligible for prosecution.

Under oath on witness stand corrupt Justice can no longer assert their crimes are work related because their no longer corrupt officials but witnesses subject to penalty of perjury and other Federal Law violations.

Take charging information Amended Count 1, Count 1A, Court III (First Trial tr.p. 74, 75, 77) ask each justice under oath has dates “subscribed and sworn to before me“ been altered?

   Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989) supra

Falsify Indiana’s Supreme Courts official records to protect society?

Indiana Code § 35-50-2-9 Death Sentence Statute?

Charging Information “Count 1A,” reads as follows:
Contrary to the form of the statute on such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the state of Indiana.
Signed Jack Hanlon

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27th day of October, 1981.
My Commission expired:     Shirley Ann Sublett, Notary Public
August 26, 1985 Shirley Ann Sublett, Putnam County Resident

The above foregoing information examined and approved by me, this 29th day of October, 1981.
Delbert H. Brewer
Prosecuting Attorney

(First Trial tr.p. 75) dates: 27th October, 81, was typed-in, then ink pen was used to altered “7”s into “9”s visible to human eyes, before filing in Putnam Circuit Court October 29, 1981.

Corrupt Prosecutor Delbert Brewer’s ex law partner attorney Stephan S. Pierson (Former deputy prosecutor) was appointed as Minnick’s public defender, day of arrest October 27, 1981, Tuesday (First Trial tr.p. 2277,2279)

Minnick v. State (September 7, 1984), 467 N.E.zd 754, on page 756, C.J. Givan wrote:

Mr. Minnick:     I’d rather have attorney.
Mr. Brewer:      Huh?
Mr. Minnick:     I’d rather have attorney.
Mr. Brewer:     That won’t stop the search warrant.
Mr. Hanlon:     That, that wont stop it.
Mr. Rogers:     Well no, but-
Mrs. Rogers:    Would it be better then, to just wait what you’ll find and then get an attorney?
Mr. Brewer:     I can’t advise you of that? You have the right to.
Mr. Hanlon:     That’s up to you.

This discussion clearly demonstrates two important facts: appellant was in custody and while in custody appellant asserted a request for the assistance of counsel. At that time the police and the prosecutor correctly stopped the interrogation. A search warrant was obtained and the body samples were taken.        Minnick supra, at 467 N.E.zd., at page 756. (1984)

Prosecutor Brewer’s law partner attorney Stephen Pierson appointed as Minnick’s public defender.

Mafia with law degrees hidden agenda, in new world order,
to reverse?

(On March 18, 1963 United States Supreme Court ruled all criminal defendants must have counsel, and illegally required evidence no longer admissible in both State and Federal Courts.)

In Indiana?

1. Corrupt Prosecutor Delbert H. Brewer’s ex law-partner attorney Stephen Pierson (former deputy prosecutor) appointed my attorney.
2. Post Conviction Relief attorneys Kevin McGoff and Lorinda Youngcourt removed State’s Exhibit Number 22 (search warrant, for Minnick’s car) (first trial tr.p. 1730-1735) inserted sheet of paper in Youngcourt’s handwriting, states.

Defendant’s Exhibit G (Return on search warrant) (First Trial tr.p. 2857; Stamped March 7 1983 clerk of the Indiana Supreme and Court of Appeals). Back page of State’s Exhibit Number 22 (Search Warrant, For Minnick’s car) in first Trial.

State’s Exhibit Number 22 (Search Warrant for Minnick’s car) (Second trial tr.p. ,1451-1, 1451-2) is a forgery, and does not bore the numbered marking tag from the first trial. These transcripts delivered in approximately 1995.

Post conviction Relief attorneys removed documents against the client/victim.

Based on Indiana Department of correction cell Standardization policy, knew Minnick did not have his trials transcripts in 1989.

Each time during a critical stage of my appeal, I.D.O.C. Has found ways to remove Minnick from most of his property, to undermine his death penalty appeals and to prevent him from effectively working on his appeal. Lock in cell 23 and 24 hours a day isolation.

Now recording attorney and client’s conversations over telephone, and no contact visits at M.C.C. so staff can listen in to attorney and client’s conversations during visit’s, maybe are being used to record conversation.

Corrupt Mafia with law degrees and politicians do not support individuals Constitutional Rights, especially, Attorney and Client Confidentiality.

A Threat to:

March 18th, 1963 United States Supreme Court ruled all criminal defendants must have counsel and illegally required evidence no longer admissible in both state and federal courts.

Falsification in Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989)

Question to protect Society or maintain the death penalty to target other poor Americans and protect corrupt officials?

Indiana Code 35-50-2-9 death sentence

Indiana code 35-50-2-9 reads “Death Sentences – (A) The state may seek a death sentence for murder by alleging, on a page separate from the rest of the charging instrument, the existence of at least one (1) of the aggravating circumstances listed in subsection (B) of this section. (emphasis added)

Indiana code 35-43-5-2 forgery statute. (Element. Completion of an genuine instrument in an unauthorized manner constitutes a forgery. Bowman v. State (1978), 398 N.E.zd. 1306.)

Forgery charging information count 1A (first trial tr.p. 75; altering dates “subscribed and sworn to before me” makes document a forgery to conceal date document was signed and notarized.) is a charging instrument which violates Indiana Code § 35-50-2-9 Death Sentence – direct language of Statute!

Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989)

Censor and Gatekeep Capital Appellate process in future?

Indiana Rules of Criminal Procedure, Criminal Rule 24 Capital Cases, adopted November 30 1989 took effect January 1, 1990.

Supreme Court cause number. Whenever a prosecuting attorney seeks the death sentence by filing a request pursuant to Ind. Code § 35-50-2-9, the prosecuting attorney shall file that request with the trial court and with the Court Administrator, Indiana Supreme Court, 312 State House, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204. Upon receipt of same, the Court Administrator shall open a cause number in the Supreme Court and notify counsel.

Before?

1 attorney x $ 30 per hour = $ 30 --> In 1989 average Death Penalty appeal had one (1) attorney, 
                                                   at estimated rate of compensation thirty dollars ($30.00) per hour.

2 attorneys x $ 90 per hour = $ 180 --> Now Indiana rules of criminal procedure, Criminal rule 24 Capital 
                                                      Cases, requires two (2) death penalty qualified attorneys at
                                                      estimated rate of compensation ninety dollars ($90) per hour.

$ 61,000.00 Court of Appeals Judge in 1988
$ 113,000.00 Court of Appeals Judge in 2003

Indiana Supreme Court is openly falsifying its records and findings of facts in 1989.

There is no fair and impartial Death Penalty Appellate Review in Indiana Supreme Coourt.

Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989) 544 N.E.zd. 471, on page 481, Justice Richard Giuan wrote:
…This Court will neither reweigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of the witnesses. 
Minnick, supra, at 544 N.E.zd., of page 481

In theory Mafia with law degrees positions:
Pretense of law, where the appearance of law must be upheld, especially where it’s being broken.

Federalists Society pushing hidden agenda against poor Americans and against new deal.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt was openly hostile to fascist governments.
President Roosevelt created “New Deal”
President Harry S. Truman help establish United Nation.

United Nation should request United States District Court to support United States Constitution of America by issuing the subpeonas to corrupt Chief Justice Randall Shephard, Justice Brent Dickson, retired Justices Roger DeBruler, Richard Givan and Alfred Pivarnik and put them under oath in a federal courtroom to be subject to penalty of perjury to obtain their testimony to facts falsified in Minnick v. State (October 2, 1989), 544 N.E.zd. 471, with no judicial Immunity.

Then read section of opinions ask is that fact true? Yes or no?
Read trials transcripts verifying fact is wrong, false, untrue or just a blatant lie.

(1988-2003) 15 years x $ 61000.00 = $ 915,000.00 not counting pay in creases since 1988, Shephard and Dickson already taken in over $ 1,000,000.00 each- eligible for retirement benefit/pension. Openly Falsified Indiana Supreme Court’s records findings of fact in death penalty appellate review.

Just think, “Motion for immediate evidentiary hearing,” has trials transcripts pages attaches verifying the answer is “Yes” before corrupt Justices walk into Courtroom. (on pages 61 and 64 couple dates are wrong due to typeo’s.
June 3, 2002 should be June 16,2002.
August 27, 2002 should be October 27, 2002.
Such facts have already been corrected in Federal Court on another filing made. Pointing out mistakes.

How deep is corruption, there 92 Counties in Indiana?

United Nation should request United States District Court to support the United States Constitution of America, by issuing the subpoenas to corrupt Justices Randall Shephard, Brent Dickson, retired Justices Roger DeBruler, Richard Givan, and Alfred Pivarnik and put them under oath to acquire their testimony – along with sending United Nations Inspections team to witness their testimony, along with other governments officials, representatives, journalists, to make a report back to United Nations calling for death penalty to be abolish in USA along with seeing corrupt officials remove from bench and prosecuted.

    Hopefully, Minnick will obtain justice, freedom and life back.

    I welcome all journalists, and citizens help across the world.

120 msg.         

Internal Investigation must be conducted to determine the deepness of organized crime inside the judiciary in U.S.A. system.

Indiana Judical Qualifications commission consists of (3) three non lawyers, (3) three lawyers and the State’s Chief Justice who is responsible for ethic violations against attorneys, judges and Court of Appeals Justices.

Here were the problem is, if the Chief Justice is corrupt and he controls that process. Yeah, corrupt Chief Justice Randell Shepard is fully exposed. (Emerge magazine, issued October, 1999. High jacking justice named Shepard. Has a hidden agenda against New Deal (System created by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, asserting Federal Government's role to average American citizens. Federal aid to unemployed, G.I.Bill. ect. and overturn landmark cases of 50‘s, 60‘s, and Civil Rights Acts of 60‘s and 70‘s.

So falsifying Indiana Supreme Court’s records verifies a corrupt political agenda. Greed for money, and power without justice allowing justices to hide behind “Judicial Immunity“ to stop economic equalization empowerment for women, minorities, and the poor citizens. Allowing one group to maintain the monopoly over the power structure and control State's Revenue maintain life style of comfort, of economic stability in the region (Indiana).

(Ind. Judicial Qualifications Commission staff attorney Meg Babcock’s letter to Minnick (me) dated July 5,2000, states:

It is very important that you understand that the Qualifications Commission does not have authority to review the decisions rendered by a judge or intervene in any legal proceeding.)

(I.D.O.C. La Donna Mitchell’s letter to Minnick (me), dated August 10, 2000, states:

The governor, under the separation of powers in the Indiana Constitution, cannot intervene in matters having been resolved or cases pending before a judicial court.)

In common English, each agencies are fully aware of State’s corruption and aware how Indiana Supreme Court is falsifying records in death penalty appeals to commit the criminal act of murder using ink pen to pull a trigger, using ignorant Footsoldiers insided I.D.O.C. as their hitchmen – using pretense of law and color of a State law as weapon Indiana Code 35-50-2-9 Death Sentence as method of operation and weapon to commit criminal act of violating Indiana Code 35-42-1-1 Murder Statute, to dispose of incriminating evidence (eye witness/defendant) against corrupt State of Indiana officials and politicians. Once the citizen is executed/ murdered the evidence is automatically destroyed, records deleted or sealed.

Who’s Jurisdiction does this type of corruption fall under?

Multi – jurisdiction:

1.) Indiana Judicial Qualifications Commission has to select new Committee and new Chief – Justice who be responsible for ethic violations against corrupt judges, Justices, prosecutors and lawyers.

2.) U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, Criminal Section, handle criminal prosecution of Conspiracy against Right of a citizen violation Title 18 U.S.C. Sec. 241. and other federal laws against corrupt Justices, Judges, prosecutors, and attorneys. (Remember, method of operation of falsifying Indiana Supreme Courts records, once you know fact is wrong then you know the case law authority does not apply.

Also means at no time would corrupt Justices knowledge the Constitution or the law in a death penalty case/ appeal.

Once corruption was exposed, in that death penalty case. Easier to execute poor citizen than admit wrong-doing and never enforce equalization plus stop a woman or minority from obtaining that government office or position.

Investigation (Determine how many cases are effected?)

Establishing Investigating teams Consists of 30 researchers to read trials transcripts and Indiana Supreme Court official opinions.

If Ind. Sup. Ct.‘s says a fact is this

(example: a witness testify to this. The researchers search trial transcripts to verify whether he or she did or not? Photograph trial transcript pages to fact.

Remember, Commission consists of 3 non lawyers 3 lawyers and the Chief Justice.

So all (3) lawyers review researchers findings, actual transcripts too.

If Ind. Sup. Ct.‘s facts are wrong?

The (3) lawyers notify the Chief Justice who notify Indiana Public Defenders office to refile new appeal for individual in prison because of illegalities of convictions process and have the case readdress properly decided, based on federal protections Constitutional rights to fair and impartial appellate review under equal protection clause and due process of law under 14th Amendment at US Constitution of America (People in prison have to be given new appeals because their entitle to justice and have families too, and are illegally imprisoned.)

Then Justice Department initiates criminal prosecution on federal law violations against corrupt justices and judges on Indiana Court of Appeals. with replacement more women and minorities being appointed to promote economic equalization diversity empowerment of more women inside the judiciary.

Ind. Jud. Qualifications commission initiates the ethic violations against corrupt justices, judges, prosecutors to guarantee their removal from bench, judiciary and forfeitures of all pension revenue they would have been eligible for had they not been detected! Disbarment proceedings.

Green light for Genocide mode in USA’s Judiciary?

As For Worldwide Knowledge?

In Herrera v. Collins (01/25/93, 6-3 decision, Texas Death Penalty case:) 113 S.Ct. 853, on pages 860, 861, 862,

... But we have also observed that. “(d)ue process does not require that every conceivable step be taken, at whatever cost, to eliminate the possibility of convicting an innocent person. ...(emphasis added)... To conclude otherwise would all but paralyze our system for enforcement of the criminal law. Herrera, supra, at 113 S.Ct., at 860.

This rule is grounded in the principle that Federal habeas courts sit to ensure that individuals are not imprisoned in violation of the Constitution – not to correct errors of Fact. Herrera, supra, at 113 S. Ct., at p. 860.

But this body of our habeas jurisprudence makes clear that a claim of “actual innocence“ is not itself a constitutional claim ... Herrera, supra, at 113 S. Ct., at 862.

USA (Hidden Agenda)

Corrupt Politicians/Officials position:

Such Fact verifies United States Supreme Court’s position innocence is not a constitutional claim. Meaning it’s not unconstitutional to execute/ murder innocent people using the Death Penalty to justify the taken of human life inside the judiciary. (Means, not isolated to one Supreme Court in the States.)

Indiana Government officials position: Pretense of the law must be upheld, especially, when the law is being broken. For financial capital gain by the exploitation of victims to promote vengeance, greed, power and lust for money- capitalism inside U.S.A.‘s Judiciary.

Indiana Supreme Court decision of July 28. 2004

Write to:

William Minnick
# 13150
X-Row
P. O. Box 41
Michigan City, IN 46361-0041
USA